25C-NBOMe Stats & Data
COc1ccccc1CNCCc1cc(OC)c(Cl)cc1OCFJFPOGCVVLUYAQ-UHFFFAOYSA-NHistory & Culture
25C-NBOMe was discovered in 2003 by Ralf Heim at the Free University of Berlin. The compound was subsequently investigated by a research team at Purdue University led by David Nichols, and was first formally described in the scientific literature by Anders Ettrup and colleagues in 2010. Research interest in 25C-NBOMe has centered on its potential applications in neuroimaging. Scientists have studied its carbon-11 radiolabelled form as a ligand for mapping the distribution of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors in the brain using positron emission tomography (PET). The compound had virtually no history of recreational human use prior to 2010, when it first emerged on the online research chemical market. Its exceptional potency—approximately sixteen times that of its parent compound 2C-C—allows effective doses to fit onto blotter paper, similar to LSD. This characteristic has led to instances where 25C-NBOMe has been found on blotter mimics sold as LSD, contributing to safety concerns and prompting regulatory responses across numerous jurisdictions beginning in 2011.
Subjective Effect Notes
physical: The physical effects of 25C-NBOMe can be broken down into several components which progressively intensify proportional to dosage.
cognitive: The cognitive effects of 25C-NBOMe are described by many as remarkably light and underwhelming in comparison to more traditional psychedelics. It is not uncommon for people to report feeling that their thought stream has maintained general normality in its specific style throughout low to moderate dosages. At high dosages, however, mild to overwhelming cognitive alterations become present; this dosage seems to be lower in proportion to physical effects when compared to 25I-NBOMe.
Effect Profile
Curated + 136 ReportsStrong visuals, headspace, auditory effects, and body load
Duration Timeline
BluelightCommunity Effects
TripSitTolerance & Pharmacokinetics
drugs.wikiTolerance Decay
Cross-Tolerances
Demographics
Gender Distribution
Age Distribution
Reports Over Time
Effect Analysis
Erowid + BluelightEffects aggregated from 136 experience reports (113 Erowid + 23 Bluelight)
Effect Sentiment Distribution
Confidence Distribution
Positive Effects 39
Adverse Effects 46
Dose-Response Correlation
How effect frequency changes across dose levels
View data table
| Effect | Common (n=25) | Strong (n=13) |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Distortions | 100.0% | 92.3% |
| Music Enhancement | 60.0% | 76.9% |
| Color Enhancement | 76.0% | 69.2% |
| Euphoria | 72.0% | 61.5% |
| Anxiety | 68.0% | 61.5% |
| Introspection | 36.0% | 53.8% |
| Dissociation | 36.0% | 46.2% |
| Empathy | 32.0% | 46.2% |
| Body High | 32.0% | 46.2% |
| Sedation | 24.0% | 46.2% |
| Confusion | 40.0% | 23.1% |
| Nausea | 40.0% | 23.1% |
| Stimulation | 32.0% | 38.5% |
| Focus Enhancement | 32.0% | 38.5% |
| Tactile Enhancement | 24.0% | 38.5% |
Subjective Effect Ontology
Experience ReportsStructured effect tags extracted from 136 Erowid & Bluelight experience reports using a controlled vocabulary of 220+ canonical effects across 15 domains.
Visual
Dose–Effect Mapping
Experience ReportsHow reported effects shift across dose tiers, based on 113 experience reports.
Limited tier coverage — most reports fall within the Common / Strong range. Effects at other dose levels may not be represented.
| Effect | Common (n=25) | Strong (n=13) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| visual distortions | → | ||
| music enhancement | ↑ | ||
| color enhancement | → | ||
| euphoria | → | ||
| anxiety | → | ||
| introspection | ↑ | ||
| dissociation | ↑ | ||
| empathy | ↑ | ||
| body high | ↑ | ||
| sedation | ↑ | ||
| confusion | ↓ | ||
| nausea | ↓ | ||
| stimulation | ↑ | ||
| focus enhancement | ↑ | ||
| tactile enhancement | ↑ | ||
| closed-eye visuals | ↑ | ||
| pain relief | ↑ | ||
| auditory effects | ↓ | ||
| open-eye visuals | ↓ | ||
| sweating | — | → |
Showing top 20 of 33 effects
Risk Escalation
Sentiment AnalysisAverage frequency of positive vs adverse effects across dose tiers
View effect breakdown
Adverse Effects
| Effect | Common (n=25) | Strong (n=13) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anxiety | -9% | ||
| Confusion | -42% | ||
| Nausea | -42% | ||
| Sweating | — | 0% | |
| Headache | +15% | ||
| Thought Loops | +44% | ||
| Pupil Dilation | +92% | ||
| Increased Heart Rate | — | 0% | |
| Muscle Tension | -3% | ||
| Memory Suppression | +92% | ||
| Jaw Clenching | +92% | ||
| Motor Impairment | — | 0% | |
| Psychosis | — | 0% |
Positive Effects
| Effect | Common (n=25) | Strong (n=13) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Music Enhancement | +28% | ||
| Color Enhancement | -8% | ||
| Euphoria | -14% | ||
| Introspection | +49% | ||
| Empathy | +44% | ||
| Body High | +44% | ||
| Stimulation | +20% | ||
| Focus Enhancement | +20% | ||
| Tactile Enhancement | +60% | ||
| Pain Relief | +220% | ||
| Creativity Enhancement | — | 0% |
Dosage Distribution
Dose distribution from experience reports
Insufflated
Sublingual
Real-World Dose Distribution
62K DosesFrom 125 individual dose entries
Sublingual (n=48)
Insufflated (n=21)
Oral (n=10)
Common Combinations
Most co-occurring substances in experience reports
Form / Preparation
Most common forms and preparations reported
Body-Weight Dosing
Dose relative to body weight from reports with weight data
Oral
Insufflated
Sublingual
Unknown
Redose Patterns
Redosing behavior across 100 reports
Legal Status
| Country | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | Illegal (SMG) | Prohibited since June 26, 2019 under the Suchtmittelgesetz (SMG). Possession, production, and sale are illegal. |
| Brazil | Controlled | Listed on Portaria SVS/MS nº 344 as of February 18, 2014. The entire NBOMe series became controlled at this time, including 25I-, 25C-, 25D-, 25B-, 25E-, 25N-, 25P-, 25T2-, 25T7-, and 25H-NBOMe. |
| Canada | Schedule III (CDSA) | Controlled as of October 31, 2016 as a derivative of 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. |
| China | Controlled | Classified as a controlled substance since October 2015. |
| Czech Republic | Banned | Prohibited under national controlled substances legislation. |
| Germany | Anlage I BtMG | Listed in Anlage I of the Betäubungsmittelgesetz (Narcotics Act) since December 13, 2014. Manufacturing, possession, import, export, purchase, sale, procurement, and dispensing without a license are prohibited. |
| Israel | Controlled | The NBOMe series became controlled in May 2013. |
| Italy | Schedule I | Classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. Possession, distribution, and manufacture are illegal. |
| Japan | Narcotic | Designated as a narcotic drug effective November 1, 2015. |
| Latvia | Schedule I | Classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. |
| New Zealand | Class C analogue | Considered substantially similar in chemical structure to the controlled hallucinogen DOB and therefore treated as a Class C controlled drug analogue. Withdrawn from sale in early 2012 following a statement by Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne. |
| Russia | Controlled | The entire NBOMe series became controlled in October 2011, making Russia the first country to regulate this class of substances. |
| Sweden | Schedule I | Added to Schedule I (substances without medical use) as of August 1, 2013, published in Medical Products Agency regulation LVFS 2013:15. |
| Switzerland | Controlled (Verzeichnis D) | Specifically named as a controlled substance under Verzeichnis D of Swiss narcotics legislation. |
| Turkey | Illegal | Classified as a controlled drug. Possession, production, supply, and import are prohibited. |
| United Kingdom | Class A | Controlled as a Class A substance since June 2014 under the N-benzylphenethylamine catch-all clause in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. Previously subject to a temporary class drug order from June 10, 2013. |
| United States | Schedule I | Emergency scheduled by the DEA on November 15, 2013, along with 25B-NBOMe and 25I-NBOMe under the Controlled Substances Act. The temporary scheduling was extended in November 2015. Several states including Arkansas, Georgia, and Louisiana added it to their Schedule I lists prior to federal action. Scheduling also makes other NBOMe compounds probable Controlled Substance Analogues when intended for human consumption. |