Beta test rollout. This site is in community QA — please send feature requests, bug reports and data corrections on the Feedback page or on GitHub.

Home
    Disclaimer
    2C-T-7 molecular structure

    2C-T-7 Stats & Data

    T7 Beautiful 7th heaven Blue mystic 2ct7
    NPS DataHub
    MW255.38
    FormulaC13H21NO2S
    CAS207740-26-9
    IUPAC2-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylsulfanylphenyl)ethanamine
    SMILESCCCSc1cc(OC)c(CCN)cc1OC
    InChIKeyOLEVEPDJOFPJTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
    Phenethylamines
    Chemical Class 2C-x phenethylamine
    Psychoactive Class Psychedelic

    Pharmacology

    DrugBank

    Mechanism of Action

    Studies involving a bromine-substituted analogue, 2C-B (4-bromo-2,5- dimethoxyphenethylamine), have shown it to be a partial agonist for 5-HT2 (5-HT2A and 5-HT2C) serotonergic receptors and 1-adrenergic receptors. At 10-6 M, 2C-B also acted as a competitive 5-HT antagonist, but, at higher concentrations (2.8 x 10-5M), it acted as a non-competitive 5-HT antagonist. ... As 2C-T-7 is phenethylamine based, it is possible that it may have serotonergic receptor affinity similar to 2C-B (i.e. binding t

    Metabolism

    ... it is likely that its metabolism may proceed via similar pathways as 2C-B, possibly with additional metabolic reactions.

    Receptor Profile

    Receptor Actions

    Agonists
    5-HT2A receptor agonist (partial)
    Inhibitors
    Monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor (reversible, theoretical)

    History & Culture

    1980–1991

    2C-T-7 was developed around 1980 by Alexander Shulgin and Peyton Jacob III as part of Shulgin's extensive research program into substituted phenethylamines. The compound was first described in scientific literature by Myron Stolaroff by 1990, with more detailed characterization published by Shulgin and colleagues the following year. The compound was subsequently included in Shulgin's influential 1991 text PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved), where it holds a distinguished position among his self-designated "magical half-dozen"—the six phenethylamine compounds Shulgin considered most significant from his research. This group comprises mescaline, DOM, 2C-B, 2C-E, 2C-T-2, and 2C-T-7, with mescaline being the only member that Shulgin did not personally design and synthesize.

    1991–2002

    Following its publication in PiHKAL, 2C-T-7 remained relatively obscure through the 1990s, produced primarily in underground college laboratories and by small commercial research operations. Around the year 2000, availability expanded significantly as grey-market commercial vendors began supplying the compound, and it transitioned from an obscure research chemical to a recreational substance appearing at parties and clubs across North America and Europe. During this period, 2C-T-7 was sold openly in Dutch and Japanese smartshops as well as through online retailers. In the Netherlands, the compound briefly appeared on the market after 2C-T-2 had been prohibited, filling the resulting commercial gap before being banned in turn.

    2002–present

    In January 2002, Rolling Stone magazine published "The New (legal) Killer Drug," an article that brought substantial public attention to 2C-T-7. While the piece suggested the substance was legal, its status under United States law was actually ambiguous at the time due to the Federal Analogue Act. The accuracy of the Rolling Stone coverage was subsequently challenged in a detailed response published on the website disinfo.com. As of August 2007, at least three deaths had been reported in association with 2C-T-7 use. These fatalities involved either insufflated doses of 30 milligrams or greater, or occurred when the compound was combined with stimulants such as MDMA. The deaths and heightened media scrutiny contributed to rapid regulatory responses in multiple jurisdictions.

    Subjective Effects

    Physical
    • Spontaneous tactile sensations: The body high of 2C-T-7 is intense but, in comparison to 2C-E or 2C-B, it can be considered mild though is still capable of becoming very powerful and highly physically euphoric. It is similar yet distinct from the body high experienced on 2C-E, 2C-B, and LSD. The sensation itself can be described as intense and will manifest itself in the form of a continuously shifting tingling sensation that travels up and down the body in spontaneous waves.
    • Stimulation: In terms of its effects on the physical energy levels of the tripper, 2C-T-7 is usually considered to be very energetic and stimulating in a fashion that is quite comparable to that of other phenethylamines such as 2C-B, 2C-E and 2C-P.
    • Increased bodily control: Although this component is capable of manifesting itself in a distinct and noticeable fashion for most users, it does not generally seem to be as apparent or intense as the same component found within LSD and 2C-B.
    • Tactile enhancement
    • Nausea: Mild to extreme nausea is commonly reported when consumed in moderate to high dosages and either passes once the tripper has vomited or gradually fades by itself as the peak sets in.
    • Temperature regulation loss
    Cognitive

    The head space of 2C-T-7 is described by many as one which is both insightful and relatively normal in its thought processes even at moderate to high dosages.

    • Current mind state enhancement
    • Thought acceleration
    • Feelings of fascination, importance and awe
    • Time distortion
    • Introspection
    • Personal bias suppression
    • Conceptual thinking
    • Ego suppression, loss and death
    • Thought loops
    • Feelings of interdependent opposites
    • Delusions
    • Unity and interconnectedness
    Sensory
    Auditory
    • Enhancements
    • Distortions
    • Hallucinations
    Visual · Distortions
    • Visual drifting: (Melting, Flowing, Breathing and Morphing) - In comparison to other psychedelics, this effect can be described as highly detailed, slow and smooth in motion, static in their appearance and extremely realistic in style but with a subtle digital/cartoonish form.
    • Tracers
    • After images
    • Texture repetition
    • Colour shifting
    • Scenery slicing
    Visual · Enhancements
    • Increased visual acuity
    • Enhancement of colour
    • Enhanced pattern recognition
    Visual · Hallucinatory States

    2C-T-7 produces a full range of high level hallucinatory states in a fashion that is more consistent and reproducible than that of many other commonly used psychedelics, particularly in comparison to other substances within the phenethylamine family.

    • External hallucinations
    • Internal hallucinations: In comparison to other psychedelics such as LSD, 2C-T-7 is very high in hallucinations embedded within visual geometry. This particular effect commonly contains hallucinations with scenarios, settings, concepts and autonomous entity contact. They are more common within dark environments and can be described as internal in their manifestation, lucid in believability, interactive in style and almost exclusively of religious, spiritual, mystical or transcendental nature in their overall theme.

    Forked from Subjective Effect Documentation by Josie Kins, April 2014. Via dose.wiki (CC0).

    Toxicity

    PsychonautWiki

    As of August 2007, there have been at least three reported deaths associated with the use of 2C-T-7. These incidents occurred with insufflated doses of 30 mg or more, or in combination with stimulants such as MDMA,. There have also been a number of reports describing concerning physical side effects and hospitalizations, typically following insufflation. It is strongly discouraged to administer 2C-T-7 non-orally because this can cause vomiting, numerous negative side effects, or death at high doses. In Erowid's Fall 2000 2C-T-7 survey, it was reported that the insufflation of 2C-T-7 resulted in more negative side effects than oral administration.

    Effect Profile

    Curated + 190 Reports
    Psychedelic 8.8

    Strong visuals, headspace, and auditory effects with strong body load

    Visual Intensity×3
    10104.0
    Headspace Depth×3
    106.81.7
    Auditory Effects×1
    10101.6
    Body Load / Somatic Effects×1
    10105.8
    Catalog Erowid BlueLight
    Empathogen 7.4

    Strong stimulation and sensory enhancement with moderate euphoria and empathy

    Empathy / Social Openness×3
    65.31.7
    Euphoria / Mood Elevation×2
    75.13.7
    Stimulation×1
    104.83.1
    Sensory Enhancement×1
    109.12.3
    Catalog Erowid BlueLight

    Duration Timeline

    Bluelight
    Onset Comeup Peak Offset After Effects
    Oral
    19 minutes - 2.33 hours
    10-30 minutes
    3-6 hours
    2-4 hours
    4-12 hours
    Total: 5-10 hours
    Insufflated
    4-19 minutes
    19 minutes - 1.0 hours
    1-2 hours
    1-2 hours
    4-12 hours
    Total: 3-7 hours
    Rectal
    10-30 minutes
    15-45 minutes
    2-4 hours
    1-3 hours
    4-12 hours

    Community Effects

    TripSit
    Negative
    nausea

    Tolerance & Pharmacokinetics

    drugs.wiki
    Half-Life
    Unknown in humans (no reliable PK published); do not equate psychoactive duration with elimination half‑life.
    Addiction Potential
    Low physical dependence; limited compulsive use potential. Psychological reinforcement possible due to euphoria and novelty, but rapid tolerance and long duration disincentivize frequent use.

    Tolerance Decay

    Full tolerance 1d Half tolerance 5d Baseline ~10d

    Pattern inferred from general serotonergic psychedelic tolerance behavior; empirical decay to baseline typically takes 10–14 days. Users often report diminished effects if re-dosing within one week.

    Cross-Tolerances

    LSD
    Psilocybin
    Other serotonergic phenethylamines (e.g., 2C‑B/2C‑E)

    Experience Report Analysis

    Erowid BlueLight
    206 Reports
    139 Single-substance
    1997–2024 Date Range
    15 With Age Data
    32 Effects Detected

    Demographics

    Gender Distribution

    Age Distribution

    Reports Over Time

    Effect Analysis

    Erowid + Bluelight

    Effects aggregated from 189 experience reports (139 single-substance Erowid + 51 Bluelight)

    189 Reports
    149 Effects Detected
    74 Positive
    51 Adverse
    24 Neutral

    Effect Sentiment Distribution

    Confidence Distribution

    Each bar is the share of reports mentioning the effect; its whisker, and the band on the rows below, is the 95% interval: where the share could plausibly be with other reports of the same kind.

    Positive Effects 74

    Visual Distortions 63.5% (95% interval 56 to 70 percent) 88%
    Color Enhancement 47.6% (95% interval 41 to 55 percent) 89%
    Visual Trails 36.0% (95% interval 24 to 50 percent) 86%
    Euphoria 30.2% (95% interval 24 to 37 percent) 90%
    Patterning 30.0% (95% interval 19 to 44 percent) 86%
    Stimulation 29.1% (95% interval 23 to 36 percent) 84%
    Music Enhancement 28.0% (95% interval 22 to 35 percent) 86%
    Melting/flowing 28.0% (95% interval 18 to 42 percent) 86%
    Surface Breathing 24.0% (95% interval 14 to 37 percent) 83%
    Joy 22.0% (95% interval 13 to 35 percent) 87%
    Awe 22.0% (95% interval 13 to 35 percent) 84%
    Empathy 21.7% (95% interval 16 to 28 percent) 82%
    Closed-Eye Visuals 21.7% (95% interval 16 to 28 percent) 89%
    Introspection 16.9% (95% interval 12 to 23 percent) 81%
    Sociability Enhancement 16.0% (95% interval 8 to 28 percent) 84%
    Morphing 16.0% (95% interval 8 to 28 percent) 85%
    Open-Eye Visuals 15.9% (95% interval 11 to 22 percent) 89%
    Geometric Imagery 14.0% (95% interval 7 to 26 percent) 86%
    Body High 13.2% (95% interval 9 to 19 percent) 86%
    Tactile Enhancement 12.7% (95% interval 9 to 18 percent) 82%

    Adverse Effects 51

    Nausea 49.2% (95% interval 42 to 56 percent) 90%
    Body Load 42.0% (95% interval 29 to 56 percent) 84%
    Anxiety 34.9% (95% interval 28 to 42 percent) 84%
    Confusion 22.2% (95% interval 17 to 29 percent) 83%
    Vomiting 22.0% (95% interval 13 to 35 percent) 90%
    Fear 22.0% (95% interval 13 to 35 percent) 86%
    Muscle Tension 19.0% (95% interval 14 to 25 percent) 90%
    Thought Disorganization 14.0% (95% interval 7 to 26 percent) 81%
    Paranoia 14.0% (95% interval 7 to 26 percent) 81%
    Depersonalization 12.0% (95% interval 6 to 24 percent) 85%
    Ataxia 10.0% (95% interval 4 to 21 percent) 82%
    Memory Suppression 8.5% (95% interval 5 to 13 percent) 88%
    Motor Impairment 8.0% (95% interval 5 to 13 percent) 88%
    Focus Suppression 8.0% (95% interval 3 to 19 percent) 78%
    Stomach Cramps 8.0% (95% interval 3 to 19 percent) 81%
    Insomnia 8.0% (95% interval 3 to 19 percent) 80%
    Disrupted Sleep Architecture 8.0% (95% interval 3 to 19 percent) 76%
    Increased Heart Rate 7.9% (95% interval 4 to 14 percent) 70%
    Pupil Dilation 7.9% (95% interval 5 to 13 percent) 88%
    Headache 7.4% (95% interval 4 to 12 percent) 89%
    ⚠ Psychosis 4.3% (95% interval 2 to 9 percent) 70%
    ⚠ Difficulty Breathing 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 80%
    Show 29 more adverse effects
    Panic 6.0% (95% interval 2 to 16 percent) 85%
    Amnesia 6.0% (95% interval 2 to 16 percent) 93%
    Restlessness 6.0% (95% interval 2 to 16 percent) 83%
    Pain Enhancement 6.0% (95% interval 2 to 16 percent) 95%
    Jaw Clenching 4.7% (95% interval 2 to 9 percent) 83%
    Field Narrowing 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent) 80%
    Irritability 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent) 72%
    Communication Suppression 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent) 78%
    Heaviness 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent) 88%
    Sadness 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent) 78%
    Dizziness 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent) 78%
    Sweating 3.7% (95% interval 2 to 7 percent) 75%
    Thought Loops 3.7% (95% interval 2 to 7 percent) 85%
    Shortness Of Breath 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 90%
    Appetite Suppression 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 90%
    Dry Mouth 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 85%
    Cold Flashes 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 85%
    Sociability Suppression 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 75%
    Lightheadedness 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 90%
    Field Widening 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 75%
    Salivation 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 85%
    Dysphoria 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 75%
    Urinary Retention 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 85%
    Paranoid Ideation 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 90%
    Chills 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 90%
    Revelatory Insight 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 80%
    Aggression 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 85%
    Emotional Blunting 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 85%
    Nightmares 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent) 90%
    Show 24 neutral or unclassified mentions
    Entity Imagery 22.0% (95% interval 13 to 35 percent)
    Auditory Effects 21.7% (95% interval 16 to 28 percent)
    Time Dilation 18.0% (95% interval 10 to 31 percent)
    Thought Acceleration 18.0% (95% interval 10 to 31 percent)
    Dissociation 14.3% (95% interval 10 to 20 percent)
    Sedation 13.2% (95% interval 9 to 19 percent)
    Hospital 12.2% (95% interval 8 to 19 percent)
    Ego Dissolution 9.6% (95% interval 6 to 15 percent)
    Warping 8.0% (95% interval 3 to 19 percent)
    Time Distortion 7.9% (95% interval 4 to 14 percent)
    Pareidolia 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent)
    Temporal Disorientation 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent)
    Tremor 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent)
    Thought Deceleration 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent)
    Blurred Vision 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent)
    Size Distortion 4.0% (95% interval 1 to 14 percent)
    Time Compression 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)
    Drowsiness 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)
    Hypersomnia 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)
    Analysis Enhancement 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)
    Texture Rippling 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)
    Body Distortion 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)
    Time Stopping 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)
    Frequent Urination 2.0% (95% interval 0 to 10 percent)

    Also reported in combinations. In the 67 2C-T-7 reports where another drug was taken too, 11 (16.4%) mention hospital, emergency services or an overdose, 0 (0.0%) a seizure and 3 (4.5%) psychosis. In the 139 single-substance reports: 12.2%, 1.4% and 4.3%. These are not in the figures above: they cannot be put down to 2C-T-7 alone, and a mention is not always something that happened to the writer.

    Dose-Response Correlation

    How effect frequency changes across dose levels. Whiskers, and the numbers' hover text, give each figure's 95% interval.

    Not drawn, too few reports (a dose tier needs 20): Oral Light (n=11), Oral Common (n=10), Oral Heavy (n=15), Insufflated Heavy (n=16). Why 20?

    View data table
    Effect Strong (n=29)
    Visual Distortions 82.8% (95% interval 66 to 92 percent)
    Nausea 55.2% (95% interval 38 to 72 percent)
    Anxiety 44.8% (95% interval 28 to 62 percent)
    Music Enhancement 37.9% (95% interval 23 to 56 percent)
    Empathy 34.5% (95% interval 20 to 53 percent)
    Stimulation 34.5% (95% interval 20 to 53 percent)
    Color Enhancement 34.5% (95% interval 20 to 53 percent)
    Sedation 31.0% (95% interval 17 to 49 percent)
    Muscle Tension 31.0% (95% interval 17 to 49 percent)
    Euphoria 27.6% (95% interval 15 to 46 percent)
    Auditory Effects 24.1% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    Closed-Eye Visuals 24.1% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    Dissociation 24.1% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    Confusion 24.1% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    Ego Dissolution 24.1% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)

    Subjective Effect Ontology

    Experience Reports

    Structured effect tags extracted from 256 Erowid & Bluelight experience reports using a controlled vocabulary of 220+ canonical effects across 15 domains.

    Gastrointestinal

    nausea 139 54.3% (95% interval 48 to 60 percent)

    Visual

    visual distortions 173 67.6% (95% interval 62 to 73 percent) color enhancement 127 49.6% (95% interval 44 to 56 percent)

    3 unique effects extracted · Derived from Erowid & Bluelight reports

    Dose–Effect Mapping

    Experience Reports

    How reported effects shift across dose tiers, based on 139 single-substance experience reports. The shaded band on each bar is its 95% interval. An arrow (↑ ↓) marks a change between the lowest and highest tier that count an effect only when the gap is bigger than chance would explain; ~ means no clear change. How changes are called

    Not drawn, too few reports (a dose tier needs 20): Oral Light (n=11), Oral Common (n=10), Oral Heavy (n=15), Insufflated Heavy (n=16). Why 20?

    Limited tier coverage — most reports fall within the Strong range. Effects at other dose levels may not be represented.

    Oral dose range: 20.0–36.0 mg (median 30.0 mg)
    Effect Strong (n=29) Change with dose
    visual distortions
    83% (95% interval 66 to 92 percent)
    nausea
    55% (95% interval 38 to 72 percent)
    anxiety
    45% (95% interval 28 to 62 percent)
    music enhancement
    38% (95% interval 23 to 56 percent)
    empathy
    34% (95% interval 20 to 53 percent)
    stimulation
    34% (95% interval 20 to 53 percent)
    color enhancement
    34% (95% interval 20 to 53 percent)
    sedation
    31% (95% interval 17 to 49 percent)
    muscle tension
    31% (95% interval 17 to 49 percent)
    euphoria
    28% (95% interval 15 to 46 percent)
    auditory effects
    24% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    closed-eye visuals
    24% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    dissociation
    24% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    confusion
    24% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    ego dissolution
    24% (95% interval 12 to 42 percent)
    introspection
    21% (95% interval 10 to 38 percent)
    tactile enhancement
    17% (95% interval 8 to 34 percent)
    headache
    17% (95% interval 8 to 34 percent)
    open-eye visuals
    14% (95% interval 6 to 31 percent)
    time distortion
    14% (95% interval 6 to 31 percent)

    Showing top 20 of 27 effects

    Dosage Distribution

    Dose distribution from experience reports, one dose per report (the first listed). Doses above Q3 + 3×IQR, far above what people typically take, are left out of the median and range and listed under each route: most are real heavy doses or overdoses, not mistakes.

    Oral

    Median: 30.0 mg IQR: 20.0–36.0 mg n=103

    1 report gave a dose above the typical range (160 mg), so it is not in the figures above. Listing a dose here does not mean it is safe.

    Show the report

    Insufflated

    Median: 11.0 mg IQR: 8.0–25.0 mg n=50

    Real-World Dose Distribution

    Erowid

    From 251 of 268 recorded dose entries: those that state a weight (mg, g or µg), in routes with at least five of them. Values above Q3 + 3×IQR, far above what people typically take, are left out; they can include real heavy doses and overdoses, not only mistakes.

    Insufflated (n=81)

    Median: 10.0mg 25th: 6.0mg 75th: 17.0mg 90th: 30.0mg

    Oral (n=158)

    Median: 25.0mg 25th: 15.0mg 75th: 35.0mg 90th: 50.0mg

    Smoked (n=10)

    Median: 3.75mg 25th: 3.0mg 75th: 9.0mg 90th: 12.0mg

    Common Combinations

    Most co-occurring substances, as a share of all 206 reports filed under 2C-T-7; whiskers are 95% intervals

    Form / Preparation

    Most common forms and preparations, as a share of the 176 reports that give one; whiskers are 95% intervals

    Body-Weight Dosing

    Dose per kg of body weight, one dose per report (the first listed), from reports giving a weight of 30–250 kg. Doses above Q3 + 3×IQR, far above what people typically take, are left out of the median and range and listed under each route.

    Oral

    Median: 0.38 mg/kg IQR: 0.257–0.46 mg/kg n=97

    2 reports gave a dose above the typical range (1.441–2.075 mg/kg), so they are not in the figures above. Listing a dose here does not mean it is safe.

    Show the reports

    Insufflated

    Median: 0.162 mg/kg IQR: 0.105–0.263 mg/kg n=44

    1 report gave a dose above the typical range (0.858 mg/kg), so it is not in the figures above. Listing a dose here does not mean it is safe.

    Show the report

    Smoked

    Median: 0.098 mg/kg IQR: 0.049–0.152 mg/kg n=6

    Redose Patterns

    Redosing behavior across 179 reports

    15.6% (95% interval 11 to 22 percent) Redosed
    1.2 Avg Doses
    30m Median Interval

    Legal Status

    European Council Decision (November 2003) - Member states required to implement control measures and criminal penalties within three months
    Country Status Notes
    Australia Schedule 9 Covered by analogue drug laws and formally added to Schedule 9 (the most restrictive category) by the National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee in 2005.
    Austria Illegal Prohibited under the Suchtmittelgesetz (SMG). Possession, production, and sale are illegal.
    Belgium Controlled Added to the list of illegal psychotropic substances on November 8, 2004.
    Brazil Controlled Possession, production, and sale are illegal. Listed on Portaria SVS/MS nº 344 as of February 18, 2014.
    Canada Schedule III Controlled as of October 31, 2016 as a derivative of 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine under the 2C-phenethylamine catch-all provision.
    China Category I psychotropic substance Controlled substance as of October 2015. Illegal to sell, buy, import, export, and manufacture.
    Denmark Category B Added to category B of the controlled substances list on August 23, 2003.
    Estonia Schedule I Added to Schedule I in February 2011 alongside several other novel psychoactive substances.
    Finland Controlled Scheduled under the government decree on substances, preparations, and plants considered to be narcotic drugs.
    Germany Anlage I BtMG Controlled under Anlage I of the Betäubungsmittelgesetz (Narcotics Act) as of July 1, 2001. Manufacturing, possession, import, export, purchase, sale, procurement, and dispensing are illegal without a license.
    Greece Controlled Became a controlled substance on February 18, 2003.
    Italy Tabella I Added to Tabella I (list of prohibited plants and substances) by Ministry of Health statement on January 11, 2005.
    Latvia Schedule I Classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. Possession, production, and distribution are prohibited.
    Netherlands List I (Opiumwet) The first country to ban 2C-T-7 after brief availability in smartshops. Following the ban on 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7 appeared on the market but was quickly prohibited under List I of the Opium Law.
    Poland Schedule I (I-P) Reported as a Schedule I controlled substance. Possession, production, and distribution are prohibited.
    Portugal Controlled Legislation enacted in January 2005 to control 2C-T-7 alongside 2C-I, 2C-T-2, and TMA-2.
    Slovakia Grade 2 Added to Grade 2 (equivalent to Schedule II under the 1971 UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances) in October 2009.
    Sweden Schedule I First classified as a health hazard under the Act on the Prohibition of Certain Goods Dangerous to Health (SFS 1999:58) as of April 1, 1999, making it illegal to sell or possess. Subsequently added to Schedule I as of March 16, 2004.
    Switzerland Controlled (Verzeichnis D) Specifically named as a controlled substance under Verzeichnis D of Swiss narcotics legislation.
    United Kingdom Class A Controlled as a Class A substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 as a result of the phenethylamine catch-all clause. In 1999, the Home Office effectively placed all compounds listed in PiHKAL into Class A.
    United States Schedule I Classified as Schedule I by emergency DEA ruling on September 20, 2002. Permanently placed in Schedule I on March 18, 2004 when the DEA published a Final Rule in the Federal Register (69 FR 12794). Manufacturing, buying, possessing, or distributing without a DEA license is illegal.

    Harm Reduction

    drugs.wiki

    Evidence-based harm-reduction points and corrections: 1) Insufflation carries disproportionate risk: at least two deaths followed nasal doses around 30–35 mg, and users frequently report burning pain, vomiting, and delirium; therefore nasal use is strongly discouraged in favor of oral titration. Source: Erowid dosage/effects pages and death summaries; EU risk communication. 2) Onset is often delayed (60–150 min, sometimes longer), which tempts premature redosing; waiting a full 3 hours before any adjustment is a practical guardrail. Source: Erowid basics/effects. 3) Likely MAO‑A involvement: sulfur‑substituted phenethylamines in this family have shown selective, reversible MAO‑A inhibition in vitro; in practice, combining 2C‑T‑7 with MAOIs (including linezolid/harmalas) or strongly serotonergic agents (MDMA, DXM, tramadol, meperidine) increases serotonin‑toxicity risk; avoid. Source: summary of Monte et al. reported on Drugs‑Forum; NCBI/StatPearls MAOI interaction guidance; Erowid deprenyl case notes. 4) Documented fatalities: at least three publicly reported deaths (two insufflated, one oral with MDMA). The prior claim of “eight deaths” is not supported by the curated sources below, so the figure is corrected to “at least three.” Source: Erowid death summaries. 5) Reagent testing: Marquis typically gives salmon orange/red with 2C‑T‑7. Use multiple reagents and beware mis-sold phenethylamines/NBOMe analogs; always test each batch. Source: Erowid Marquis chart and history notes. 6) Set, setting, sitter: high-dose reactions may include dissociation, agitation, or delirium; vomiting plus confusion increases aspiration risk; a sober sitter and calm environment reduce danger; seek emergency care for persistent chest pain, high temperature, seizures, cyanosis, or uncontrolled agitation; medical benzodiazepines are standard for severe agitation. Source: Erowid effects/overdose narratives. 7) Route cautions: IM/IV/injection has been associated with severe adverse events and is further discouraged; rectal use is less characterized—dose reductions versus oral are prudent. Source: Erowid surveys/pharmacology article. 8) Tolerance: acute tolerance emerges after one session and decays over about 10–14 days, with cross‑tolerance to serotonergic psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin). Source: TripSit general psychedelic tolerance guidance; community reports; Erowid survey patterns. 9) Street names and recognition: “T7,” “Blue Mystic,” “Beautiful,” and “Tripstasy/7‑Up” have appeared in historical markets; knowing aliases helps with test‑kit interpretation and avoiding misrepresented pills. Source: Erowid vault and East Bay Express article mirrored at Erowid. 10) Pharmacokinetics are not characterized in humans; no reliable elimination half‑life is published in the curated literature below. Duration of effects should not be conflated with half‑life. Source: Erowid basics notes “Pharmacology Summary Needed.”

    References

    ← Back to 2C-T-7