Home
    Disclaimer
    4-AcO-DiPT molecular structure

    4-AcO-DiPT Stats & Data

    Ace Aces 4-ace Ipracetin Iprocetyl 4-acetoxy-dipt 4acodipt
    NPS DataHub
    MW302.42
    FormulaC18H26N2O2
    CAS936015-60-0
    IUPAC[3-[2-(di(propan-2-yl)amino)ethyl]-1H-indol-4-yl] acetate
    SMILESCC(=O)Oc1cccc2ncc(CCN(C(C)C)C(C)C)c12
    InChIKeyZPAOVGZYDSXCPK-UHFFFAOYSA-N
    2020/5.1 Indol-3-alkylamine; 2021/5.1 Indol-3-alkylamine; 2022/5.1 Indol-3-alkylamine
    Chemical Class Tryptamine
    Psychoactive Class Psychedelic

    Receptor Profile

    Receptor Actions

    Agonists
    5-HT2A receptor agonist (full)
    5-HT2C receptor agonist (full)

    History & Culture

    4-AcO-DiPT was first characterized in the scientific literature by Alexander Shulgin, with documentation appearing by 2003. The compound is described in TiHKAL (Tryptamines I Have Known and Loved), Shulgin's comprehensive reference work on tryptamine compounds co-authored with Ann Shulgin. The substance represents one of the early psychedelic research chemicals that emerged following Shulgin's initial synthesis and documentation, predating the widespread proliferation of online research chemical vendors that would later characterize the early 2000s market. It was first identified as a novel designer drug in 2005, marking its appearance in recreational and research contexts outside of Shulgin's laboratory work.

    Effect Profile

    Curated + 47 Reports
    Psychedelic 7.2

    Strong visuals, auditory effects, and body load with moderate headspace

    Visual Intensity×3
    1010
    Headspace Depth×3
    68.5
    Auditory Effects×1
    1010
    Body Load / Somatic Effects×1
    1010
    Catalog Erowid

    Tolerance & Pharmacokinetics

    drugs.wiki

    Tolerance Decay

    Full tolerance 1h Half tolerance 10d Baseline ~14d

    Cross-Tolerances

    LSD
    30% ●○○
    Psilocybin
    30% ●○○
    Psilocin
    30% ●○○
    Mescaline
    30% ●○○
    DMT
    30% ●○○
    5-MeO-DMT
    30% ●○○
    2C-B
    30% ●○○
    2C-E
    30% ●○○

    Experience Report Analysis

    Erowid
    47 Reports
    1999–2012 Date Range
    6 With Age Data
    28 Effects Detected

    Demographics

    Gender Distribution

    Age Distribution

    Reports Over Time

    Effect Analysis

    Erowid

    Effects aggregated from 47 experience reports (47 Erowid)

    47 Reports
    28 Effects Detected
    10 Positive
    10 Adverse
    8 Neutral

    Effect Sentiment Distribution

    Confidence Distribution

    Positive Effects 10

    Empathy 59.6% 70%
    Stimulation 57.4% 70%
    Music Enhancement 48.9% 70%
    Tactile Enhancement 48.9% 70%
    Euphoria 42.6% 70%
    Color Enhancement 34.0% 70%
    Introspection 23.4% 70%
    Focus Enhancement 23.4% 70%
    Body High 21.3% 70%
    Creativity Enhancement 10.6% 70%

    Adverse Effects 10

    Nausea 38.3% 70%
    Anxiety 36.2% 70%
    Confusion 29.8% 70%
    Muscle Tension 27.7% 70%
    Increased Heart Rate 17.0% 70%
    Pupil Dilation 14.9% 70%
    Headache 10.6% 70%
    Motor Impairment 8.5% 70%
    Memory Suppression 8.5% 70%
    Jaw Clenching 6.4% 70%

    Dose-Response Correlation

    How effect frequency changes across dose levels

    View data table
    Effect Common (n=19) Strong (n=12)
    Visual Distortions 89.5% 75.0%
    Empathy 47.4% 66.7%
    Stimulation 57.9% 58.3%
    Tactile Enhancement 36.8% 58.3%
    Music Enhancement 52.6% 25.0%
    Anxiety 21.1% 50.0%
    Euphoria 42.1% 41.7%
    Color Enhancement 36.8% 16.7%
    Nausea 36.8% 33.3%
    Confusion 31.6% 33.3%
    Body High 26.3% 33.3%
    Sedation 26.3% 16.7%
    Dissociation 26.3% 16.7%
    Muscle Tension 26.3% 25.0%
    Open-Eye Visuals 10.5% 25.0%

    Dose–Effect Mapping

    Experience Reports

    How reported effects shift across dose tiers, based on 47 experience reports.

    Limited tier coverage — most reports fall within the Common / Strong range. Effects at other dose levels may not be represented.

    Oral dose range: 20.0–32.0 mg (median 25.0 mg)
    Effect Common (n=19) Strong (n=12)
    visual distortions
    90%
    75%
    empathy
    47%
    67%
    stimulation
    58%
    58%
    tactile enhancement
    37%
    58%
    music enhancement
    53%
    25%
    anxiety
    21%
    50%
    euphoria
    42%
    42%
    color enhancement
    37%
    17%
    nausea
    37%
    33%
    confusion
    32%
    33%
    body high
    26%
    33%
    sedation
    26%
    17%
    dissociation
    26%
    17%
    muscle tension
    26%
    25%
    open-eye visuals
    10%
    25%
    ego dissolution
    21%
    focus enhancement
    21%
    increased heart rate
    21%
    17%
    hospital
    21%
    auditory effects
    21%

    Showing top 20 of 27 effects

    Risk Escalation

    Sentiment Analysis

    Average frequency of positive vs adverse effects across dose tiers

    Common n=19
    10 positive 35.3% 8 adverse 21.7%
    Strong n=12
    8 positive 39.6% 7 adverse 27.4%
    View effect breakdown

    Adverse Effects

    Effect Common (n=19) Strong (n=12) Change
    Anxiety
    21%
    50%
    +136%
    Nausea
    37%
    33%
    -9%
    Confusion
    32%
    33%
    5%
    Muscle Tension
    26%
    25%
    -4%
    Increased Heart Rate
    21%
    17%
    -20%
    Headache
    10%
    17%
    +59%
    Motor Impairment
    17%
    0%
    Pupil Dilation
    16%
    0%
    Thought Loops
    10%
    0%

    Positive Effects

    Effect Common (n=19) Strong (n=12) Change
    Empathy
    47%
    67%
    +40%
    Stimulation
    58%
    58%
    0%
    Tactile Enhancement
    37%
    58%
    +58%
    Music Enhancement
    53%
    25%
    -52%
    Euphoria
    42%
    42%
    0%
    Color Enhancement
    37%
    17%
    -54%
    Body High
    26%
    33%
    +26%
    Focus Enhancement
    21%
    0%
    Introspection
    16%
    17%
    5%
    Creativity Enhancement
    16%
    0%

    Dosage Distribution

    Dose distribution from experience reports

    Median: 25.0 mg IQR: 20.0–32.0 mg n=35

    Real-World Dose Distribution

    62K Doses

    From 74 individual dose entries

    Oral (n=69)

    Median: 20.0mg 25th: 17.0mg 75th: 30.0mg 90th: 37.6mg
    mg/kg median: 0.284 mg/kg 75th: 0.408

    Common Combinations

    Most co-occurring substances in experience reports

    Form / Preparation

    Most common forms and preparations reported

    Body-Weight Dosing

    Dose relative to body weight from reports with weight data

    Median: 0.365 mg/kg IQR: 0.267–0.427 mg/kg n=34

    Redose Patterns

    Redosing behavior across 39 reports

    25.6% Redosed
    1.4 Avg Doses
    150m Median Interval

    Legal Status

    Country Status Notes
    Denmark Schedule B Listed as a Schedule B controlled substance under Danish drug control legislation.
    Finland Controlled substance Banned in December 2014 under a government regulation that prohibited over 100 psychoactive chemicals.
    Germany Controlled (NpSG) Controlled under the Neue-psychoaktive-Stoffe-Gesetz (New Psychoactive Substances Act) as of July 18, 2019. Production, import with intent to distribute, administration to others, and trading are punishable offenses. Possession is illegal but not subject to criminal penalties.
    Japan Designated Substance (Shitei-Yakubutsu) Controlled under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law, making both possession and sale illegal.
    Sweden Illegal Classified as a health hazard under the Act on the Prohibition of Certain Goods Dangerous to Health (Lagen om förbud mot vissa hälsofarliga varor) as of March 1, 2005, in regulation SFS 2005:26. Both possession and sale are prohibited.
    Switzerland Controlled (Verzeichnis E) Specifically named as a controlled substance under Verzeichnis E of Swiss narcotics legislation.
    United Kingdom Class A Controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. This classification applies because 4-AcO-DiPT is an ester of 4-HO-DiPT, which is controlled under the tryptamine catch-all clause.
    United States Unscheduled Not scheduled under the Controlled Substances Act. However, due to structural similarities to scheduled tryptamines such as psilocin, possession and sale for human consumption may be prosecuted under the Federal Analogue Act. Pending cases have existed since July 2004 involving vendors selling this substance, though no convictions have established further legal precedent.
    ← Back to 4-AcO-DiPT