2C-I Stats & Data
[Cl-].NCCc1cc(OC)c(I)cc1OC.[H+]OTUXWIRPEPMONF-UHFFFAOYSA-NPharmacology
DrugBankDescription
2C-I is a lesser known psychedelic of the substituted phenethylamine class. In the early 2000s, 2C-I was sold in Dutch smart shops after the drug 2C-B was banned.
Receptor Profile
Receptor Actions
History & Culture
1976–1991
2C-I was first synthesized and investigated for human activity by Alexander Shulgin in the mid-to-late 1970s. The compound was initially described in scientific literature in 1977, with its properties and effects in humans documented the following year. Shulgin later provided a more comprehensive account of his research with 2C-I in his 1991 book PiHKAL (Phenethylamines I Have Known and Loved), which brought the substance to wider public awareness within psychedelic research communities. The presence of a heavy iodine atom in the molecule made 2C-I particularly suitable for radio-labeling experiments. The compound has been synthesized with radioactive iodine for research purposes, though more extensive radiological findings have emerged from studies using its three-carbon amphetamine analog, DOI.
1995–2004
2C-I began to emerge as a recreational substance in the late 1990s, initially gaining popularity in Dutch smart shops where it was sold as a legal alternative to 2C-B following that compound's scheduling in 1995. The substance became more widely available through grey market online vendors around 2002, marketed as a "research chemical" alongside other novel psychoactive substances. Distribution significantly declined after a series of DEA enforcement actions in 2004 that targeted vendors selling research chemicals intended for human consumption. Throughout its period of availability, 2C-I was sometimes confused with the structurally related but considerably more potent compound 25I-NBOMe, which media outlets subsequently nicknamed "Smiles." This confusion has contributed to ongoing concerns about accurate identification and appropriate harm reduction information for users.
Subjective Effect Notes
cognitive: The head space of 2C-I is described by many as one which is relatively normal in its thought processes even at moderate to high dosages. It is often said to lack insight when compared to that of 2C-E, 2C-B and LSD.
Effect Profile
Curated + 650 ReportsStrong visuals, headspace, auditory effects, and body load
Duration Timeline
BluelightEmpirical Duration
Erowid ReportsCommunity Effects
TripSitTolerance & Pharmacokinetics
drugs.wikiDemographics
Gender Distribution
Age Distribution
Reports Over Time
Effect Analysis
Erowid + BluelightEffects aggregated from 558 experience reports (508 Erowid + 142 Bluelight)
Effect Sentiment Distribution
Confidence Distribution
Positive Effects 73
Adverse Effects 45
Dose-Response Correlation
How effect frequency changes across dose levels
Oral
View data table
| Effect | Light (n=14) | Common (n=109) | Strong (n=124) | Heavy (n=33) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Distortions | 78.6% | 90.8% | 84.7% | 100.0% |
| Anxiety | 78.6% | 44.0% | 42.7% | 45.5% |
| Stimulation | 71.4% | 66.1% | 46.0% | 45.5% |
| Empathy | 64.3% | 40.4% | 41.9% | 33.3% |
| Color Enhancement | 35.7% | 62.4% | 62.1% | 45.5% |
| Music Enhancement | 57.1% | 54.1% | 49.2% | 42.4% |
| Euphoria | 28.6% | 56.0% | 41.9% | 30.3% |
| Nausea | 42.9% | 36.7% | 26.6% | 33.3% |
| Sedation | 35.7% | 39.4% | 39.5% | 18.2% |
| Tactile Enhancement | 35.7% | 36.7% | 36.3% | 39.4% |
| Confusion | 28.6% | 32.1% | 37.9% | 33.3% |
| Auditory Effects | 35.7% | 26.6% | 27.4% | 24.2% |
| Ego Dissolution | 35.7% | 15.6% | 12.9% | 12.1% |
| Introspection | 0% | 33.9% | 24.2% | 24.2% |
| Focus Enhancement | 14.3% | 32.1% | 30.6% | 30.3% |
Insufflated
View data table
| Effect | Heavy (n=29) |
|---|---|
| Visual Distortions | 86.2% |
| Music Enhancement | 51.7% |
| Confusion | 48.3% |
| Color Enhancement | 44.8% |
| Euphoria | 44.8% |
| Empathy | 44.8% |
| Stimulation | 37.9% |
| Nausea | 34.5% |
| Anxiety | 34.5% |
| Introspection | 31.0% |
| Tactile Enhancement | 24.1% |
| Body High | 20.7% |
| Focus Enhancement | 17.2% |
| Auditory Effects | 17.2% |
| Open-Eye Visuals | 17.2% |
Subjective Effect Ontology
Experience ReportsStructured effect tags extracted from 650 Erowid & Bluelight experience reports using a controlled vocabulary of 220+ canonical effects across 15 domains.
Auditory
Cognitive
Emotional
Gastrointestinal
Motor
Somatic
Tactile
Visual
Dose–Effect Mapping
Experience ReportsHow reported effects shift across dose tiers, based on 508 experience reports.
| Effect | Heavy (n=29) | |
|---|---|---|
| visual distortions | ||
| music enhancement | ||
| confusion | ||
| color enhancement | ||
| euphoria | ||
| empathy | ||
| stimulation | ||
| nausea | ||
| anxiety | ||
| introspection | ||
| tactile enhancement | ||
| body high | ||
| focus enhancement | ||
| auditory effects | ||
| open-eye visuals | ||
| dissociation | ||
| hospital | ||
| sedation | ||
| headache | ||
| closed-eye visuals |
Showing top 20 of 22 effects
| Effect | Light (n=14) | Common (n=109) | Strong (n=124) | Heavy (n=33) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| visual distortions | ↑ | ||||
| anxiety | ↓ | ||||
| stimulation | ↓ | ||||
| empathy | ↓ | ||||
| color enhancement | ↑ | ||||
| music enhancement | ↓ | ||||
| euphoria | → | ||||
| nausea | ↓ | ||||
| sedation | ↓ | ||||
| tactile enhancement | → | ||||
| confusion | ↑ | ||||
| auditory effects | ↓ | ||||
| ego dissolution | ↓ | ||||
| introspection | — | ↓ | |||
| focus enhancement | ↑ | ||||
| closed-eye visuals | ↓ | ||||
| body high | ↑ | ||||
| open-eye visuals | ↓ | ||||
| muscle tension | — | ↓ | |||
| jaw clenching | ↓ |
Showing top 20 of 34 effects
Risk Escalation
Sentiment AnalysisAverage frequency of positive vs adverse effects across dose tiers (Oral)
View effect breakdown
Adverse Effects
| Effect | Light (n=14) | Common (n=109) | Strong (n=124) | Heavy (n=33) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anxiety | -42% | ||||
| Nausea | -22% | ||||
| Confusion | +16% | ||||
| Muscle Tension | — | -73% | |||
| Jaw Clenching | -71% | ||||
| Pupil Dilation | -36% | ||||
| Motor Impairment | — | +80% | |||
| Headache | — | -58% | |||
| Psychosis | -36% | ||||
| Memory Suppression | — | +120% | |||
| Thought Loops | — | +227% | |||
| Increased Heart Rate | — | — | -25% | ||
| Sweating | — | — | -13% | ||
| Appetite Suppression | — | — | +33% |
Positive Effects
| Effect | Light (n=14) | Common (n=109) | Strong (n=124) | Heavy (n=33) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stimulation | -36% | ||||
| Empathy | -48% | ||||
| Color Enhancement | +27% | ||||
| Music Enhancement | -25% | ||||
| Euphoria | 5% | ||||
| Tactile Enhancement | 10% | ||||
| Introspection | — | -28% | |||
| Focus Enhancement | +111% | ||||
| Body High | +48% | ||||
| Creativity Enhancement | — | -26% | |||
| Pain Relief | — | — | — | 0% |
Dosage Distribution
Dose distribution from experience reports
Oral
Insufflated
Real-World Dose Distribution
62K DosesFrom 591 individual dose entries
Oral (n=466)
Insufflated (n=42)
Smoked (n=9)
Common Combinations
Most co-occurring substances in experience reports
Form / Preparation
Most common forms and preparations reported
Body-Weight Dosing
Dose relative to body weight from reports with weight data
Oral
Insufflated
Smoked
Unknown
Redose Patterns
Redosing behavior across 377 reports
Legal Status
| Country | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | Schedule 9 | Prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard. The National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee formally added 2C-I to Schedule 9 (the most restrictive category) in 2005. |
| Austria | Illegal (SMG) | Controlled under the Suchtmittelgesetz (Narcotics Act). Possession, production, and sale are prohibited. |
| Belgium | Illegal | Added to the list of illegal psychotropic substances on November 8, 2004. |
| Brazil | Illegal | Possession, production, and sale prohibited under Portaria SVS/MS nº 344. Controlled as of February 18, 2014. |
| Canada | Schedule III (CDSA) | Controlled under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act as of October 31, 2016. |
| China | Category I Psychotropic Substance | Illegal to sell, buy, import, export, and manufacture as of September 2010. |
| Czech Republic | Controlled | Added to controlled substance lists in early 2011 alongside BZP, synthetic cannabinoids, and various cathinone derivatives. |
| Denmark | Controlled | Classified as a controlled substance since May 2002. |
| Estonia | Schedule I | Added to Schedule I in February 2011 alongside various synthetic cathinones and cannabinoids. |
| Finland | Illegal | Scheduled under the government decree on substances, preparations, and plants considered to be narcotic drugs. |
| France | Controlled | Added to the list of controlled substances in August 2004 as a synthetic analogue of mescaline. |
| Germany | Anlage I BtMG | Controlled under Anlage I of the Betäubungsmittelgesetz (Narcotics Act) as of October 10, 1999. Manufacturing, possession, import, export, purchase, sale, procurement, and dispensing without license are prohibited. |
| Greece | Controlled | Illegal to possess under Table A of Law 1729/87. |
| Ireland | Schedule 1 | Controlled as a Schedule 1 substance, prohibiting possession and distribution. |
| Israel | Controlled | Added to the list of controlled substances in December 2007, making purchase, sale, and possession illegal. |
| Italy | Tabella I | Added to Tabella 1 (list of prohibited plants and substances) by Ministry of Health statement on January 11, 2005. |
| Japan | Designated Substance (Shitei-Yakubutsu) | Controlled under the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law, making possession and sale illegal. |
| Latvia | Schedule I | Classified as a Schedule I controlled substance. |
| Netherlands | Controlled | Classified as a controlled substance under national drug legislation. |
| New Zealand | Schedule 3 / Class C | Controlled under the catch-all analogues provision in Schedule 3 / Class C of national drug laws. |
| Poland | Controlled | Classified as a controlled substance under national drug legislation. |
| Portugal | Controlled | Legislation enacted in January 2005 to control 2C-I alongside 2C-T-2, 2C-T-7, and TMA-2. |
| Sweden | Schedule I (Narcotic) | Added to Schedule I by Sveriges riksdag on March 16, 2004, published in Medical Products Agency regulation LVFS 2004:3. Classified as a substance normally without medical use. |
| Switzerland | Controlled (Verzeichnis D) | Listed in Anhang D of the Betäubungsmittelverzeichnisverordnung (DetMV) since December 12, 1996. Possession is illegal. |
| Turkey | Illegal | Classified as a drug. Possession, production, supply, and import are prohibited. |
| United Kingdom | Class A | Controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 via the phenethylamine catch-all clause. Class A carries the most severe penalties for possession and supply. |
| United States | Schedule I | Controlled under the Synthetic Drug Abuse Prevention Act of 2012, effective July 9, 2012. Possession, distribution, and manufacture are federal offenses. Several states including Minnesota, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin had scheduled the substance prior to federal action. |
Harm Reduction
drugs.wikiIdentity and misrepresentation: 2C‑I has often been confused with or sold as 25I‑NBOMe/NBOH; NBOMe compounds are active at microgram doses, can cause local oral numbness and intense bitterness, are not reliably active when simply swallowed, and have been linked to hospitalizations and deaths—test samples and avoid blotters claimed to be “2C‑I.” Use multiple reagents and, ideally, lab testing (FTIR/GC‑MS) when possible. Redosing: EMCDDA notes 2C‑I can have a slower onset than expected, which has led some users to prematurely redose or add other drugs; wait at least 2 hours after an oral dose before considering any change. Intranasal risks: snorting 2C‑x (including 2C‑I) is frequently reported as extremely painful and more likely to cause nausea, vomiting, and a harsh stimulant edge; many experienced users avoid the route—if used, reduce dose markedly and expect severe nasal irritation. Cardiovascular strain: phenomenology and receptor data (5‑HT2A/2C and potential alpha‑1 adrenergic action) imply vasoconstriction, mild tachycardia and blood‑pressure elevation; those with cardiovascular disease, hypertension, or migraine susceptibility should avoid use and all users should minimize exertion/overheating. Serotonergic/seizure‑threshold cautions: avoid combinations with MAOIs entirely and with tramadol due to seizure and serotonin‑toxicity risks; SSRIs/SNRIs may blunt effects and complicate response. Lithium is specifically flagged as dangerous with classical serotonergic psychedelics due to seizure risk; do not combine. Set and setting: stimulation can amplify anxiety—use with a trusted sober sitter in a calm environment; avoid crowded, hot venues on first trials. Hydration and temperature: sip water periodically (not excessively) and take cool breaks if active; overheating increases risk with stimulating psychedelics. Dosing discipline: always allergy test with a very small amount (e.g., 1–3 mg oral), then titrate across separate sessions using a 0.001 g scale; never eyeball. Sleep and after‑effects: residual stimulation can impair sleep into the next day; plan recovery time and do not drive or operate machinery for at least 12–24 hours after significant effects resolve. Legal and substitution risk: 2C‑I is Schedule I in the U.S. and controlled in many countries; the market has historically included mislabeling (including NBOMe and DOx) so reagent test each sample.
References
Data Sources
Cited References
Drugs.wiki References
- Erowid 2C‑I Vault (overview; confusion with NBOMe)
- EMCDDA/Europol risk assessment on 2C‑I (delayed onset; receptor notes)
- Drugs‑Forum 2C‑I wiki (reagents; typical dosing mention)
- Bluelight: List of Dangerous & Potentially Unsafe Combinations (MAOIs with phenethylamine psychedelics; lithium cautions)
- TripSit Wiki: Tramadol (seizure and serotonergic risks)
- Bluelight NBOMe safety warning (mislabelled blotters; fatalities and unpredictability)
- Drugs‑Forum: Notice of intent to schedule NBOMe (reports of deaths)
- Drugs‑Forum: 2C‑I trip reports (onset and phenomenology; supports timing ranges)