Home
    Disclaimer
    DMT molecular structure

    DMT Stats & Data

    Dmitry Dimitri N,n-dmt Fantasia The glory dimethyltryptamine
    NPS DataHub
    MW224.73
    FormulaC12H17ClN2
    CAS13392-38-6
    SMILES[Cl-].CN(C)CCc1cnc2ccccc12.[H+]
    InChIKeyFXCHKLOHTIIVJW-UHFFFAOYSA-N
    Tryptamines; 2020/5.1 Indol-3-alkylamine; 2021/5.1 Indol-3-alkylamine; 2022/5.1 Indol-3-alkylamine
    Chemical Class Tryptamine
    Psychoactive Class Psychedelic
    Half-Life ~5–15 min (IV; ultra-rapid distribution/elimination); effects resolve within ~20 min when smoked/vaporized.

    Pharmacology

    DrugBank
    State Solid

    Description

    An N-methylated indoleamine derivative, a serotonergic hallucinogen found in several plants, especially Prestonia amazonica (Apocynaceae) and in mammalian brain, blood, and urine. It apparently acts as an agonist at some types of serotonin receptors and an antagonist at others.

    Mechanism of Action

    DMT acts as a non-selective agonist at most or all of the serotonin receptors.

    Indication

    Some people use this compound as a psychedelic inducing agent.

    Receptor Profile

    Receptor Actions

    Agonists
    5-HT2A receptor agonist (partial)
    5-HT1A receptor agonist (partial)
    5-HT2C receptor agonist (partial)
    Sigma-1 receptor agonist

    History & Culture

    DMT has been used as an entheogen in South America for thousands of years, primarily in the form of ayahuasca brews and snuffs. Archaeological evidence suggests snuff use dating back several millennia, though DMT typically served as a minor constituent in these preparations rather than the primary compound. Amazonian tribes have traditionally employed ayahuasca to receive guidance from protective spirits, gain insight into the causes and treatments of illness, perceive future events, communicate with distant groups, prepare for warfare and hunting, and identify enemies and their intentions.

    1931–1957

    DMT was first synthesized in 1931 by Richard Helmuth Fredrick Manske, a Canadian chemist. The compound's hallucinogenic properties remained unknown for another quarter century until Hungarian chemist and psychiatrist Stephen Szára investigated them in 1956. Szára had initially attempted to acquire LSD from Sandoz Laboratories in Switzerland, but his request was denied on the grounds that such a potent psychotropic substance could prove dangerous in the hands of a communist country. This rejection led him to synthesize DMT in his own laboratory and test it on himself through injection. He subsequently administered it to several medical colleagues before expanding his study to thirty additional participants, predominantly physicians. In 1955, DMT was definitively isolated from a plant source for the first time, extracted from Anadenanthera peregrina seeds used in traditional snuff preparations. Two years later, American chemists identified DMT in leaves of a plant they erroneously named "Prestonia amazonicum." This taxonomic error later influenced writer William Burroughs, who experimented with DMT in Tangier in 1961 under the belief he was using "Prestonia."

    1930s–1961

    Following the Amazon rubber boom, several syncretic religious movements incorporating ayahuasca emerged in Brazil. These traditions blended indigenous South American practices with Catholic and European influences alongside Brazilian cosmological beliefs. Santo Daime, the first of these movements, was founded in the 1930s by Raimundo Irineu Serra, a Brazilian rubber tapper. Barquinha formed in 1945 through a schism with Santo Daime. The União do Vegetal was established in 1961 by Jose Gabriel da Costa, also a rubber tapper. These religious movements would later become central to legal challenges regarding DMT's controlled status, with the UDV's 2006 U.S. Supreme Court victory establishing important precedent for religious use exemptions.

    1960s–2010

    During the 1960s in the United States, DMT earned the colloquial name "businessman's trip" due to its rapid onset, intense effects, and relatively brief duration—allowing users to experience the full depth of a psychedelic journey in considerably less time than substances like LSD or psilocybin mushrooms. Ethnobotanist Terence McKenna became instrumental in popularizing DMT during the 1980s and 1990s, particularly advocating for inhalation as the preferred route of administration. He spoke enthusiastically and frequently about his experiences, introducing many to the substance's unique phenomenology. In the 1990s, Rick Strassman, a medical doctor at the University of New Mexico Hospital Clinical Research Center, began the first government-approved research on DMT in decades. He selected the compound for study because of its short duration, natural occurrence in humans, potentially unexplored physiological roles, and relative obscurity. His research led to the publication of "DMT: The Spirit Molecule" in 2000 and an accompanying documentary in 2010. Strassman hypothesized that DMT might be produced in the pineal gland and released during dreams, birth, and death—ideas subsequently popularized by McKenna and others, though they remain scientifically unconfirmed.

    A distinctive cultural phenomenon surrounding DMT is the remarkably consistent reports of encounters with apparently autonomous entities during the experience. Terence McKenna coined the term "machine elves" for the beings he first encountered after smoking DMT in Berkeley in 1965, also describing them as "fractal elves" or "self-transforming machine elves." In analyzing self-reports from his clinical study participants, Strassman observed striking similarities between descriptions of these entities and figures from ancient religious traditions, including the Ḥayyot haq-Qodesh from Hebrew mysticism, as well as various depictions of angels and demons. He and others have speculated that such hallucinatory experiences may underlie reports of alien abduction and extraterrestrial encounters, suggesting DMT's effects might illuminate the neurological basis of certain mystical and paranormal experiences.

    Subjective Effect Notes

    cognitive: The head space of DMT is described by most as extremely sober and clear headed in its style when compared to other commonly used psychedelics such as LSD, psilocin or even ayahuasca. It contains a limited amount of typical cognitive effects. DMT in its smokeable form is perhaps the least psychologically intoxicating psychedelic, leading many people to describe it not as a drug induced trip but a genuine experience that is actually happening to them.

    Effect Profile

    Curated + 1,292 Reports
    Psychedelic 9.1

    Strong visuals, headspace, and auditory effects with mild body load

    Visual Intensity×3
    10105.3 6/25
    Headspace Depth×3
    108.53.3 7/25
    Auditory Effects×1
    8102.2 8/25
    Body Load / Somatic Effects×1
    52.21.9 4/25
    Catalog Erowid BlueLight

    User Experiences

    Visuals "I sat up at the edge of the bed and opened my eyes, distortions such as visual drifting along with geometric patterns still covered my whole field of vision." Effect Index
    Headspace "Complete and utter ego death hits." Effect Index
    Auditory Effects "At about 90 seconds I started hearing a powerful sound that was not coming from the ears." Bluelight

    Duration Timeline

    Bluelight
    Onset Comeup Peak Offset After Effects
    Smoked
    0-1 minutes
    3-10 minutes
    15 minutes - 1.0 hours
    Oral
    30-45 minutes
    45 minutes - 1.0 hours
    2-3 hours
    1-2 hours
    4 hours
    Insufflated
    3-4 minutes
    45 minutes - 1.0 hours
    15 minutes - 1.0 hours
    Intravenous
    0 minutes
    0 minutes
    0-6 minutes
    12-18 minutes
    15-60 minutes hours

    Community Effects

    TripSit
    Positive
    visual enhancement euphoria introspection
    Negative
    nausea anxiety tachycardia

    Tolerance & Pharmacokinetics

    drugs.wiki
    Half-Life
    ~5–15 min (IV; ultra-rapid distribution/elimination); effects resolve within ~20 min when smoked/vaporized.
    Addiction Potential
    Very low; no documented physical dependence and limited evidence of compulsive use in observational and community data.

    Tolerance Decay

    Full tolerance 0.5h Half tolerance 0d Baseline ~1d

    Human studies found minimal to no rapid psychological tolerance after closely spaced IV administrations compared to other psychedelics; subjective effects remained robust, although some biological measures declined across repeated doses. Community reports suggest the ability to redose within a session with little tolerance, but cumulative physiological/psychological load increases. Data quality is mixed; cross-tolerance with other 5‑HT2A psychedelics is presumed but not well quantified.

    Cross-Tolerances

    psilocybin
    50% ●○○
    LSD
    50% ●○○
    mescaline
    30% ●○○

    Experience Report Analysis

    Erowid BlueLight
    1,043 Reports
    1991–2025 Date Range
    729 With Age Data
    31 Effects Detected

    Demographics

    Gender Distribution

    Age Distribution

    Reports Over Time

    Effect Analysis

    Erowid + Bluelight

    Effects aggregated from 1,093 experience reports (1,043 Erowid + 249 Bluelight)

    1,093 Reports
    135 Effects Detected
    70 Positive
    30 Adverse
    35 Neutral

    Effect Sentiment Distribution

    Confidence Distribution

    Positive Effects 70

    Entity Imagery 68.0% 90%
    Color Enhancement 62.8% 87%
    Awe 42.0% 86%
    Geometric Imagery 40.0% 88%
    Empathy 38.8% 80%
    Insight 38.0% 83%
    Euphoria 35.3% 88%
    Stimulation 34.2% 83%
    Music Enhancement 30.2% 86%
    Tactile Enhancement 26.6% 70%
    Focus Enhancement 25.9% 70%
    Revelatory Insight 24.0% 86%
    Mystical Quality 24.0% 89%
    Fractal Imagery 24.0% 92%
    Introspection 20.3% 83%
    Morphing 20.0% 87%
    Wonder 18.0% 84%
    Peace 18.0% 86%
    Body High 16.8% 85%
    Environmental Transfiguration 16.0% 88%

    Adverse Effects 30

    Anxiety 53.7% 84%
    Fear 36.0% 84%
    Confusion 28.7% 82%
    Body Load 24.0% 77%
    Depersonalization 24.0% 80%
    Panic 14.0% 86%
    Memory Suppression 10.2% 82%
    Pressure 8.0% 82%
    Nausea 7.4% 76%
    Thought Disorganization 6.0% 80%
    Increased Heart Rate 5.4% 70%
    Motor Impairment 4.3% 80%
    Taste Distortion 4.0% 88%
    Vomiting 4.0% 88%
    Dread 4.0% 95%
    Muscle Tension 3.7% 70%
    Psychosis 3.3% 70%
    Thought Loops 3.0% 78%
    Sweating 2.7% 85%
    Jaw Clenching 2.4% 70%

    Dose-Response Correlation

    How effect frequency changes across dose levels

    View data table
    Effect Light (n=11) Common (n=56) Strong (n=71) Heavy (n=60)
    Visual Distortions 63.6% 82.1% 83.1% 81.7%
    Color Enhancement 54.5% 60.7% 67.6% 76.7%
    Anxiety 72.7% 62.5% 46.5% 48.3%
    Empathy 45.5% 50.0% 40.8% 41.7%
    Euphoria 36.4% 32.1% 36.6% 45.0%
    Confusion 36.4% 25.0% 35.2% 43.3%
    Closed-Eye Visuals 27.3% 41.1% 40.8% 41.7%
    Music Enhancement 36.4% 41.1% 29.6% 35.0%
    Dissociation 0% 23.2% 26.8% 38.3%
    Stimulation 36.4% 33.9% 31.0% 36.7%
    Auditory Effects 36.4% 30.4% 35.2% 25.0%
    Tactile Enhancement 36.4% 30.4% 21.1% 26.7%
    Introspection 0% 19.6% 33.8% 26.7%
    Focus Enhancement 27.3% 30.4% 31.0% 30.0%
    Time Distortion 27.3% 12.5% 14.1% 20.0%

    Subjective Effect Ontology

    Experience Reports

    Structured effect tags extracted from 1,292 Erowid & Bluelight experience reports using a controlled vocabulary of 220+ canonical effects across 15 domains.

    Auditory

    music enhancement 330 28.0% auditory distortions 278 26.7%

    Cognitive

    confusion 314 26.1% focus enhancement 270 25.9% introspection 222 19.0% memory suppression 112 9.2%

    Emotional

    anxiety 587 48.8% empathy 424 33.5% euphoria 385 34.1%

    Motor

    stimulation 373 29.8%

    Selfhood

    dissociation 265 21.1% ego dissolution 143 14.5%

    Somatic

    body high 184 19.5%

    Tactile

    tactile enhancement 277 26.6%

    Temporal

    time distortion 146 11.9%

    Visual

    visual distortions 788 61.3% color enhancement 686 59.6% closed eye visuals 376 32.5% open eye visuals 116 12.7%

    19 unique effects extracted · Derived from Erowid & Bluelight reports

    Dose–Effect Mapping

    Experience Reports

    How reported effects shift across dose tiers, based on 1043 experience reports.

    Smoked dose range: 30.0–60.0 mg (median 50.0 mg)
    Effect Light (n=11) Common (n=56) Strong (n=71) Heavy (n=60)
    visual distortions
    64%
    82%
    83%
    82%
    color enhancement
    54%
    61%
    68%
    77%
    anxiety
    73%
    62%
    46%
    48%
    empathy
    46%
    50%
    41%
    42%
    euphoria
    36%
    32%
    37%
    45%
    confusion
    36%
    25%
    35%
    43%
    closed-eye visuals
    27%
    41%
    41%
    42%
    music enhancement
    36%
    41%
    30%
    35%
    dissociation
    23%
    27%
    38%
    stimulation
    36%
    34%
    31%
    37%
    auditory effects
    36%
    30%
    35%
    25%
    tactile enhancement
    36%
    30%
    21%
    27%
    introspection
    20%
    34%
    27%
    focus enhancement
    27%
    30%
    31%
    30%
    time distortion
    27%
    12%
    14%
    20%
    body high
    18%
    12%
    20%
    15%
    open-eye visuals
    18%
    9%
    14%
    13%
    increased heart rate
    18%
    5%
    7%
    7%
    ego dissolution
    11%
    14%
    8%
    memory suppression
    11%
    8%
    13%

    Showing top 20 of 34 effects

    Risk Escalation

    Sentiment Analysis

    Average frequency of positive vs adverse effects across dose tiers

    Light n=11
    8 positive 36.4% 3 adverse 42.4%
    Common n=56
    10 positive 31.6% 12 adverse 12.2%
    Strong n=71
    10 positive 32.1% 10 adverse 12.2%
    Heavy n=60
    11 positive 31.4% 9 adverse 14.6%
    View effect breakdown

    Adverse Effects

    Effect Light (n=11) Common (n=56) Strong (n=71) Heavy (n=60) Change
    Anxiety
    73%
    62%
    46%
    48%
    -33%
    Confusion
    36%
    25%
    35%
    43%
    +18%
    Increased Heart Rate
    18%
    5%
    7%
    7%
    -63%
    Memory Suppression
    11%
    8%
    13%
    +24%
    Motor Impairment
    9%
    4%
    5%
    -43%
    Muscle Tension
    9%
    6%
    3%
    -62%
    Nausea
    5%
    6%
    5%
    -7%
    Headache
    5%
    0%
    Jaw Clenching
    4%
    4%
    +16%
    Appetite Suppression
    4%
    0%
    Psychosis
    4%
    0%
    Thought Loops
    4%
    3%
    -8%
    Sweating
    3%
    3%
    +17%
    Pupil Dilation
    3%
    0%

    Positive Effects

    Effect Light (n=11) Common (n=56) Strong (n=71) Heavy (n=60) Change
    Color Enhancement
    54%
    61%
    68%
    77%
    +40%
    Empathy
    46%
    50%
    41%
    42%
    -8%
    Euphoria
    36%
    32%
    37%
    45%
    +23%
    Music Enhancement
    36%
    41%
    30%
    35%
    -3%
    Stimulation
    36%
    34%
    31%
    37%
    0%
    Tactile Enhancement
    36%
    30%
    21%
    27%
    -26%
    Introspection
    20%
    34%
    27%
    +36%
    Focus Enhancement
    27%
    30%
    31%
    30%
    9%
    Body High
    18%
    12%
    20%
    15%
    -17%
    Creativity Enhancement
    5%
    10%
    8%
    +53%
    Pain Relief
    3%
    0%

    Dosage Distribution

    Dose distribution from experience reports

    Smoked

    Median: 50.0 mg IQR: 30.0–60.0 mg n=196

    Insufflated

    Median: 60.0 mg IQR: 20.0–85.0 mg n=11

    Real-World Dose Distribution

    62K Doses

    From 1008 individual dose entries

    Smoked (n=423)

    Median: 42.0mg 25th: 30.0mg 75th: 60.0mg 90th: 94.0mg
    mg/kg median: 0.605 mg/kg 75th: 0.882

    Oral (n=54)

    Median: 80.0mg 25th: 50.0mg 75th: 163.75mg 90th: 250.0mg
    mg/kg median: 1.05 mg/kg 75th: 2.857

    Intravenous (n=9)

    Median: 32.0mg 25th: 22.0mg 75th: 60.0mg 90th: 60.0mg
    mg/kg median: 0.456 mg/kg 75th: 0.667

    Insufflated (n=15)

    Median: 55.0mg 25th: 32.5mg 75th: 82.5mg 90th: 96.0mg
    mg/kg median: 0.939 mg/kg 75th: 1.343

    Common Combinations

    Most co-occurring substances in experience reports

    Form / Preparation

    Most common forms and preparations reported

    Body-Weight Dosing

    Dose relative to body weight from reports with weight data

    Smoked

    Median: 0.613 mg/kg IQR: 0.429–0.882 mg/kg n=194

    Insufflated

    Median: 0.962 mg/kg IQR: 0.689–1.634 mg/kg n=10

    Oral

    Median: 1.686 mg/kg IQR: 0.701–3.342 mg/kg n=6

    Redose Patterns

    Redosing behavior across 554 reports

    10.3% Redosed
    1.1 Avg Doses
    60m Median Interval

    Legal Status

    UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances 1971 (Schedule I)
    Country Status Notes
    Brazil Legal (religious use of ayahuasca) Brazilian law was adjusted in 1996 to permit the religious use of ayahuasca following a legal challenge from the União do Vegetal church. This exemption applies specifically to traditional ceremonial contexts. Synthetic DMT remains controlled.
    Canada Schedule III Listed as a Schedule III controlled substance under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. This scheduling carries criminal penalties for unauthorized possession and trafficking.
    New Zealand Class A Controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975. Class A drugs carry the highest penalties under New Zealand drug legislation.
    United Kingdom Class A Controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Class A substances carry the most severe penalties for possession, production, and distribution.
    United States Schedule I Controlled under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Classified as having high abuse potential with no accepted medical use. However, in 2006 the Supreme Court ruled that the União do Vegetal (UDV) church could use their ayahuasca brew for religious purposes despite DMT's Schedule I status, based on the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

    Harm Reduction

    drugs.wiki

    - Test and verify substance identity: DMT is an indole and typically reacts positive with indole-sensitive reagents (e.g., Ehrlich), but reagent color alone cannot prove purity; formal drug checking is preferred. Mislabeling between N,N-DMT and 5-MeO-DMT has led to overdoses due to very different potency and effects profiles.

    - Vaporization technique matters: use heat, not direct flame; pre-measure with a mg-accurate scale; expect that melted residue can linger in glassware and cause unexpected extra milligrams later. Sit or lie down before the last inhalation to avoid falls due to rapid incapacitation.

    - Cardiovascular effects (transient hypertension/tachycardia) are common at psychoactive doses; screen for uncontrolled hypertension, significant cardiac disease, or recent stimulant use; avoid combining with vasopressors or strong stimulants.

    - Oral DMT requires MAO-A inhibition; this markedly increases duration/intensity and interaction risks. Avoid serotonergic medications (SSRIs/SNRIs/TCAs), tramadol, meperidine, DXM, and stimulant drugs for an adequate washout period when MAOIs are involved. Some foods high in tyramine can pose added risk with prescription/strong MAOIs.

    - Mental health cautions: strong psychedelics can precipitate or exacerbate psychosis or mania in vulnerable individuals; those with personal/family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders should avoid or proceed only with clinical oversight.

    - Sitter and environment: due to near-instant onset, a sober sitter should remove hot devices and protect from falls. Use in a quiet, seated/lying setting with minimal obstacles.

    - Avoid redosing loops: acute tolerance is minimal with DMT compared to LSD/psilocybin; however, repeated back-to-back inhalations can stack cardiovascular/psychological load without providing integration time.

    - Changa (DMT on MAOI-containing herbs) typically requires slightly lower DMT doses and lasts longer than freebase alone; interaction cautions of harmalas apply.

    - Pulmonary irritation is common with hot or combusted vapor; lower-temperature vaporization and cooling the vapor (e.g., water piece) can reduce airway discomfort; individuals with reactive airway disease should be cautious.

    - Distinguish N,N-DMT from 5-MeO-DMT: 5-MeO-DMT is active at much lower doses and carries higher risk of severe adverse reactions, particularly with MAOIs. Never assume marketed “DMT” is N,N-DMT; verify before dosing.

    - Drug checking services (where available) can detect adulterants and misrepresentation; several European services have reported misdeclared tryptamine products, underscoring the need for verification before use.

    References

    ← Back to DMT